Debunking Dr. Josef Mengele’s Human Eye Research – ZERO Twin Eyeballs – HOAXER Nyiszli LIED -Eric Hunt’s Karin Magnussen Hadamar Heist – The Müller-Hill Correspondence

Following is a Google translation of German documents  scanned from the Ernst Klee archives within the Hadamar archives. The archives were sealed until 2018. Then, only lying hoaxers were able to access the documents until your boy Eric Hunt pulled an Ethan Hunt and heisted them out. Now I mansplain to you what this rabbit reaping lesbian was trying to tell us all – Dr. Josef Mengele dindu nuffin.

Benno Müller-Hill writes Karin Magnussen, partner with Dr. Josef Mengele in the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute’s pioneering study that almost got credit for discovering Waardenburg syndrome before some Dutch guy Waardenburg named it years after their cutting edge research into this rare hereditary disorder. There’s still time! Rename Waardenburg syndrome Mengele-Magnussen syndrome!

This prick Hill wants to write a book saying how European anthropology is evil and rayciss and Mengele did all the bullshit Frankenstein shit the Jews lie on him about. He contacts Magnussen, who is horrified when she reads his absurd scenario of invented dialogue and false accusations and she refuses to allow him to print any of the interview he makes up as he sees fit.

Here are her protests and declarations of the TRUTHS I reveal today

Unsure if this is connected or not but this hoaxing bastard Benno Müller-Hill also died in 2018, the year the archives were “opened” to Jews to be approved to glance at the documents I have full scans of shared above on archive.org. I wish I could have exposed this farce while Hill was still alive. 

While slapping together his shitty book “Murderous Science” which frames Mengele and declares anthropology evil and rayciss, typical corrupt hoaxing journalist slimeball Benno Müller-Hill tries to frame Dr. Josef Mengele and the reaper of rabbits based lesbian zoologist Karin Magnussen.

Our gal Karin tells Bernar Müller-Hill to fuck right the hell off, to throw his pathetic fictionalized “interview transcript” he somehow remembered over two years after the conversation into the trash, and that Dr. Joe dindu nuffin.

Now Eric Hunt tells you we are throwing anything Mengele hoaxer Miklos Nyiszli ever wrote into the trashbin of history, because Karin Magnussen was NEVER sent twin eyeballs at all, let alone three pair of heterochromia gypsy twin eyeballs of people that NEVER EXISTED, as ZERO twins let alone THREE PAIR with rare heterochromia were in the Mechau family of gypsies studied by the REAL heterochromia eye study (which attempted to change one gypsy’s eyes from blue to brown, as the albino like eye was defected and displayed being destroyed by ocular tuberculosis in the patient’s brother, who recently died)

LIAR LIAR Miklos Nyiszli says he :

1. In one version of the story he discovers these 3 pair of heterochromia gypsies -and another pair with normal eyes for good measure) were stabbed in the heart by Mengele who injected them with chloroform cuz he’s doing an autopsy a dark and stormy night (like Frankenstein and shit) and finds pinpricks in their hearts and smells chloroform and the heart’s completely clotted – despite chloroform NOT BEING CAPABLE OF PRODUCING INSTANT MASSIVE BLOOD CLOTS WHATSOEVER).
2. In another version of the story he claims he saw Mengele stab the twins himself and he prepared them right before death. BOTH ARE BULLSHIT.

KARIN MAGNUSSEN NEVER STUDIED ANY TWINS IN ANY EYE STUDY, AT ALL. Not the one where she got pairs of eyes from the Mechau fam from Auschwitz, OR the other human eye study of Magnussen’s – where NONE of the eyes came from Auschwitz, lying jews who deliberately hid the exonerating documents I heisted just say they did.

Commentary : We all know by now the typical corrupt journalist trick. “I’m your best friend come interview with me, the book totally won’t be titled “Nazi Doctors of Doom and their bloodthirsty quest to perfect a Master Race by Massacring millions and the minions who helped ’em”

INSTITUT FÜR GENETIK

der Universität zu Köln

Prof. B. Müller-Hill

Weyertal 121

5000 Köln 41, 27.10.80

Telephone 470/ 2388

Mrs.

Dr. Karin Magnussen

Hagenauerstr. 7

2800 Bremen

Dear Mrs. Dr. Magnussen,

may I return to the telephone conversation conducted yesterday? I told you that I am working on a book about the history of human genetics / eugenics / anthropology in Germany. The KWI for Anthropology, Human Heredity and Eugenics stands thereby in the center of my interest. Beside the reading of the works of the institute, conversations with still living staff members seemed to me of great importance for my undertaking. You were so friendly to grant me time for such a conversation. As a provisional date you chose Monday, the 3rd of November, three o’clock. If from your side a postponement of the date should become necessary, I ask you to call me either at the institute or privately (0221-239333).

With excellent high regard!

[Signature: B. Müller-Hill]

Commentary : Karin Magnussen writes back, naive about the journalists seeking to have her lynched. She actually thinks he’s going to be fair and partial and not come in with predetermined conclusions and is really interested in anthropology, like I am.

Bremen, 11.11.80

Mr. Prof. Dr. B. Müller-Hill Institute for Genetics of the University Weyertal 121 5000 Cologne 41

Very honored Mr. Prof. Müller-Hill!

Enclosed send I the promised offprint from Fischer: “On the absence of rickets among the Bambuti in the Congo primeval forest” and besides still 2 others, which I still picked out have. The conclusion of the article (paper unfortunately damaged) “The exploration of man” (1928) have I underlined, since from it Fischer’s attitude very clear becomes. – Also an article from Agnes Bluhm, about whose works we recently spoke, lay I with in.

If I to me your task imagine, could I of me only say that I to me alone from the technical side here not trust would, about the history of anthropology to write (I am neither anthropologist, nor human geneticist) Perhaps could one the human genetics exclude and only the great anthropologists of the older generation honor: v. Eickstedt, Fischer, Lenz and perhaps still Weinert. – I can only regret, that you neither Prof. Fischer nor Prof. Lenz gotten to know have. I would have Lenz for the only possible successor of Fischer held. Unfortunately has Fischer another proposed. With that is for me an insurmountable break arisen, no “line of development”, as you it see! The consequence was yes also later the closure of the institute, as it generally at the MPG (formerly KWG) undertaken becomes, if no suitable successor available is.

The exploration on the area of mental talents, which you particularly critical see, is surely particularly difficult and corresponds in its methods not the requirements of animal genetics and certainly right not exact methods of modern molecular genetics. When will there better methods be?

I have once tried, some from your aspects out to read – not quite simple, but one must yes try, the younger, who under completely different viewpoints and prerequisites to a matter approaches, to understand. There are certainly still very many misunderstandings and unclarities, which in a discussion cleared up become can. Somehow must the generations try, one another to understand. Often are it things on the surface, which from the essential distract – If one to the essential foundations comes, is the agreement again there.

I am thereat, a series of books for you together to put and will therefore in the evening once at you call. Perhaps finds itself a time, which us both fits.

With friendly greeting

INSTITUT FÜR GENETIK

der Universität zu Köln

Prof. B. Müller-Hill

Weyertal 121

5000 Köln 41, 12.11.1980

Telephone 470/ 2388

Mrs.

Dr. Karin Magnussen

Hagenauerstr. 7

2800 Bremen

Dear Mrs. Magnussen,

have you once again many thanks for the conversation, your call and the offprints. I send you the same immediately with separate mail back and remain

with excellent high regard!

[Signature: B. Müller-Hill]

PS:

Just now receive I your letter and the further offprints. Have you also for this many thanks.

INSTITUT FÜR GENETIK

der Universität zu Köln

Prof. Dr. B. Müller-Hill

Weyertal 121

5000 Köln 41, 12.3.1982

Telephone 470/ 2388

Mrs.

Dr. Karin Magnussen

Hagenauerstr. 7

2800 Bremen

Dear Mrs. Dr. Magnussen,

may I turn to you once again with a request? During a conversation with Prof. Melchers about the Kaiser-Wilhelm-Gesellschaft in Berlin, he remembered a manuscript by you that he had to review for the ‘Zeitschrift für induktive Abstammungs- und Vererbungslehre’ [Journal of Inductive Genetics and Heredity] at the end of 1944. In the manuscript, the eye abnormalities of a Gypsy family were described. The article never appeared. Do you still possess the manuscript? I would be extraordinarily grateful to you if you could leave this manuscript or a copy to me for a short time and remain

with excellent high regard!

[Signature: B. Müller-Hill]

Bremen, 19.4.1982

Very honored Mr. Prof. Müller-Hill!

Since I assume that you today from your vacation back are, send I to you my most extensive Dahlem work as photocopied manuscript. I assume that you for this and for the preface thereto some interest have.

At present sit I heavily in work. Free holidays give it for me (because of the rabbit breeding) at all not. To your letter from 12.3. will I at a later point in time return.

With the request for return after taking note

*) The 8 plates of figures, which for you probably less important are, send I not with, could them however at disposal place, if you it wish.

INSTITUT FÜR GENETIK der Universität zu Köln Prof. Dr. B. Müller-Hill

Weyertal 121 5000 Köln 41, 21.4.1982 Telephone 470/ 2388

Dr. Karin Magnussen Hagenauerstr. 7

2800 Bremen

Dear Mrs. Dr. Magnussen,

have you many thanks for the sending of the galley proofs of your work “The effect of the color genes on the pigment development in the rabbit eye”. What confuses me, is, that to this work any reference to works on human eyes is missing. It can itself therefore hardly about the work act, of which Prof. Melchers to me reported. I will Mr. Melchers call, in order to clarify to try, whether it itself in this work about the by him mentioned acted.

During looking through of the literature fell my eye then upon your work in the Ztschrft. Morph. und Anthr. (1944), in press, in which you about human eyes report. This journal volume is here not available. Could you the friendliness have, to me also a copy of this article to send. You understand, that to me on the clarification of the matter lies.

I attach your manuscript and remain

with excellent high regard!

[Signature: B. Müller-Hill]

Enclosure Manuscript back

INSTITUT FÜR GENETIK

der Universität zu Köln

Prof. Dr. B. Müller-Hill

Weyertal 121

5000 Köln 41, 12.7.83

Telephone 470/ 2388

(Handwritten note top right: Call on 14.7. / Breitbach best regards)

Mrs.

Dr. Karin Magnussen

Hagenauerstr. 7

2800 BREMEN

(Handwritten note on left margin: Of a publication of the conversations was at that time no talk, sondern von einem Bericht (Paragraph 27.10.80). Otherwise would I immediately a protocol demanded)

Dear Mrs. Dr. Magnussen,

You were so friendly to grant me some time ago a conversation about your viewpoint on the problem of anthropology and / or psychiatry in the Third Reich. I had sought the conversation with you, as with other anthropologists and psychiatrists, in order to possibly modify and to correct my position, which after pure file study etc. was very critical. I had also told you at the time that I would write down the course of the conversation. For the case of a possible publication of the conversations I had promised you to send you your conversation manuscript, in order to eliminate errors or misunderstandings. At the point in time of the conversations it seemed rather remote to assume that these conversations could ever be printed. This situation has now surprisingly changed.

A German publisher has shown interest to publish my historical study “Secrecy and Destruction, Remarks on Anthropology and Psychiatry” together with the conversations and a document appendix. I hold the inclusion of the conversations in the volume for an extraordinarily important matter in the sense of historical justice. For only through the conversations it becomes convincingly clear, in what diverse manner the individual scientists in their isolated activity were more or less excluded from the understanding of the catastrophic reality and consequences of the National Socialist racial and population policy.

– 2 –

• 2 –

I made an effort at the time to conduct the conversations openly and to record them truthfully. I furthermore made an effort to follow your words and in doing so to write nothing hurtful. It would, however, be untrue to conceal that at individual points of the conversation, diametrically different views possibly confronted each other. I found it right to preserve these oppositions and not to pass over them.

I would now be grateful to you if you would write to me your possible wishes for correction. I promise you to observe these as far as possible and remain

with highest regards!

[Signature]

Enclosure: Conversation manuscript

– 69-f –

Dr. Karin Magnussen

She lives in an old single-family house. The room is gloomy through the drawn curtains. Art Nouveau. A giant picture ‘ A scene from Faust, the church has a large stomach ‘ shows Mephisto, Faust, Gretchen and Mrs. Schwertlein. Beside it portraits and small landscapes in the manner of Corot. A beautiful black sculpture of a mother with her child at her breast. A large relief of a dying youth in the Italian style. I ask about the pictures.

” The Faust picture is from the grandfather, the landscapes and portraits are from the father. He was an academy professor. The sculptures are from the mother. ” Around the table stand wicker chairs. In a niche a bed or sofa. Beside it a tall cabinet with drawers. On it a small altar with pictures of the parents and flowers.

It is a day after Sunday of the Dead. She is tall-grown, has parted grey hair and a rather masculine face with clever eyes behind eyeglass lenses. She offers me tea or coffee and cake.

” How have you begun? ” ” Doctorate under Kühn in Göttingen on a topic of developmental mechanics (she shows an offprint about the resulting work.) Then went I into the school. There stayed I from 1933 to 40. There have I the laws and regulations on racial hygiene and the statistics collected. The other female teachers have always again said, give us indeed the material. I wanted it as “Material for Teachers” to publish. Lehmann the publisher found the title “Equipment” pulls more people in. I have at that time also scientifically worked. In infants followed, how the eye color from blue to brown converted. In heterozygotes is that slower than in homozygotes. That was completely in connection with my interest for the development of pigment-

– 70 –

dyestuffs. “

“1940 wrote I then to Kühn, whether I with him on eye pigments work could. He referred me to Eugen Fischer. So came I thus as a scholarship holder to Fischer. The assistant positions were all occupied. On paper. The assistants were in the field, the positions were however kept open for them. ” ” Were there employee meetings in the institute? ” ” No. Everyone worked for himself. One could perhaps once ask a colleague. But basically was everyone reliant on himself. ” ” Lectures? ” ” No, none in the institute. In the Harnackhaus there were lectures on various fields. “

” Fischer was a brilliant man. He proved the operation of Mendel’s laws in humans. You know the ‘Rehobother Bastards’? He led anthropology back into genetics. A scholar of such vision exists today no more. Fischer fared like Hahn. Hahn was innocent of the atomic bomb which the Americans dropped. ” I object that the Hahn observation was correct, the Fischer conjecture on the other hand, mental properties are inherited, on the other hand to this day unproven is. She goes over it. ” The today’s politicians disregard criminally the findings of the institute. The consequences will all come to feel. But one may not say the truth, or? ” ” One must show that it also is the truth, ” say I and ask about v. Verschuer. ” He was an epigone. It would be better if he had never come to the institute. I would not like to speak about him. Two days before the trucks came which were to relocate the institute to the West, he told it to us. But his Bible circle knew it already two days before. We could just give along one or two crates. He has taken all his things with him. I then with some of our rabbits to Göttingen in the train traveled. It was forbidden to take animals along. When the people slept, have I fed them. After the war worked I then for some time

– 71 –

in a research institute. But I wanted no permanent position. The risk was to me too great. Then became I a female teacher in Berlin. It took a while until my papers were clear. The Americans looked indeed after everything there. But finally it worked out after all. “

” How see you that today, eugenics, the “equipment” etc.? ” ” The SS has destroyed everything for us that we wanted. We represented the Völkisch idea. “

” What is that? ” ” That is the separation of races under mutual respecting of the different peoples. So had we in the Office of Racial Policy thought! You know what that is? Only if one there member was, durfte man Vorträge über Rassenkunde halten. That was a very important and good organization. Before it existed, have all sorts of people talked the most impossible things. I have before BDM girls spoken and NSV women groups. Völkisch separation, that was a good principle. I had in my class a Jewish girls. There was gar kein Problem. I have said: We do this and you do that. We have never said, that the one race more valuable as the other be. Or good and the other bad be. That is a value judgment. Scientists have every value judgment to abstain from. What we wanted, that was a Europe of peoples.

(she smiles). That has the SS all destroyed. Our whole eugenics have they with their plans destroyed. We were for the family and they were for their Lebensborn and so on. ” ” Had you conferences or meetings in the Office of Racial Policy, where about these things discussed was? ” ” No, that had we not. 44 should I then still an edition of the “Equipment” prepare. There wanted I no more. I have no thank you said. There was namely Stalingrad. A leader of his people sacrifices not an army because of the fame. That is the end of eugenics. A leader should see, that his people

– 72 –

receives maximum care. ” ” You gave indeed the numbers of the fallen in the various campaigns and showed that in the first half year in the Soviet Union more German soldiers had fallen than in all campaigns combined. “

” That is correct “, says she. ” That with Stalingrad was impossible. “

” When did you get doubts about racial policy, ” ask I.

” I knew nothing, nobody in my large circle of friends knew anything. ” ” Fischer? Lenz? Verschuer? ” ” None of those knew anything. No human being knew anything. It was all secret. I do not even know whether the Führer knew of these atrocities of the SS. ” I tell that Gottschaldt knew and told it to Fischer. She smiles incredulously. ” So Gottschaldt knew that? And what did Fischer say? ” ” If the Führer knew that, say I. ” That is completely correct “, says she. ” If the German people had known that, then this atrocity could not have taken place. Do you know the memory book by Hanna Reitsch “, asks she. ” No “. ” Mrs. Reitsch learned in Sweden about it. Then she went to Himmler and asked. ‘ That have I in Sweden heard. Is that true? ‘ ‘ Do you believe that? ‘, Himmler asked back. ‘ Of course not ‘, she said. And with that it was settled. So was that. All secret. ” ” Have you ever listened to enemy radio stations? “, ask I. ” Never, that knew we after all from the First World War, that the others made an atrocity propaganda that was completely untrue. ” ” Do you think that Fischer listened to enemy radio stations? “, ask I. ” Never. He remembered after all also the chopped off hands. We knew nothing. “

” But Mengele, Verschuer’s assistant, was after all in Auschwitz. Verschuer must after all have learned something? “, say I and ask ” Have you seen Mengele? “

” Yes, ” says she. ” He made a sympathetic and nice impression. He told how he looked after his twins in Auschwitz. About Rh factors

– 73 –

has he worked, remember I. That is after all only too natural that he looked after his twins. He worked after all with twins. ” ” But you know after all that he killed some to send the eyes to the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute? ” say I. ” No, that is after all completely impossible that a scientist kills someone, that is after all completely impossible. ” ” Have you received the eyes, you worked after all on eyes “, ask I. She is silent. ” How have you met Mengele? Via Verschuer? ” ask I. ” Yes naturally through Verschuer, he knew after all nobody in the institute. Verschuer introduced him in the institute. ” ” It is after all quite obvious to assume that Verschuer brought you the eyes or had them sent to you. “, say I. ” It is completely impossible that a scientist kills another human being “, says she. ” Nobody knew anything. The murders of the SS are incomprehensible. They have nothing to do with racial theory. We wanted demarcation, but no murders. “, says she. ” But demarcation meant after all transport through all of Europe to ‘Galicia’ into a ‘ghetto’, that comes after all already close to murder when one transports people in cattle cars “, say I. ” To observe that, had we no time, says she. Every night was alarm. Never could one sleep through the night and during the day then the scientific work. There had one no time anymore for anything else. “

” Where did the error begin? ” , ask I. ” With the Nuremberg Laws. There were only the Jews named. That was after all outrageous that any Japanese who is even further removed, then a German woman was allowed to marry. That was the first error. ” ” But there was after all hardly a dozen Japanese, for those one needed after all no law “, say I. ” Even one molecule, as you know, can have a great effect, ” says she. ” It was also for foreign policy reasons impossible “, say I. ” Yes that was after all

– 74 –

outside of our power. Through the Nuremberg Laws everything was directed at the Jews. ” I ask about the conference for the opening of the High School and the discussion of the total solution of the Jewish question. ” No, of that have I never heard “, says she. ” That was no topic of conversation. ” ” Was there anti-Semitism in the institute? ” ” No, that was there not at all “, says she. ” The Frankfurt conference and what was discussed there (I told her before Seraphim’s remarks) that was politics, that was nothing for us. Rosenberg interested me not. That was after all impossible “. ” That was politics, we made science. ” ” You wanted after all separation “, say I, ” and that means in cattle train from France to Poland e.g. “, say I. ” We had no time, about that to reflect, who in the trains was. There was after all the bomb terror, every night. “

I tell of the Fischer speech in Paris, where he, after he the atrocities of Jewish Bolsheviks reported, said ‘ the Jews have thereby set themselves outside of the human species ‘. ” There were after all the atrocities of the Bolsheviks. An acquaintance has told me. Those were after all also no humans. ” But the atrocity of one can after all not fall back on all “, say I. ” No that can it not “, says she. ” But that has after all Fischer meant. ” Silence. ” The SS, the Mengele “, says she, ” those were no humans. Who so something does, who is no human. ” And then says she: ” What we need is democracy ” and ” write You that not. It is much too early, that to understand. The time is not yet ripe. The past is much too near. You want the truth, I see that, but I ask You, leave You that fifteen years lie. Otherwise is it soon no longer true, what You write. The truth of today, so says it after all, is the error of yesterday. You can yourself also severely harm, if You that now write. “

Commentary : Magnussen protests that this slimeball’s recollection of a conversation is no hard record, and they should have had a stenographer take word for word dication of the conversation to be reviewed on site and signed by both parties.

This slimeball Muller-Hill went off and made a whole bunch of shit up, then pretended to be able to remember direct dialogue and put direct full lines of dialogue in quotations, like he’s Irene Zisblatt’s retarded ghost writer with her trash memoir fraud where everyone is speaking in full lines of dialogue somehow remembered 50 years later.

She’s horrified by all this, and it’s absurd to her he thinks she can correct the record somehow with this total frame up job with a few notes. It’s all trash and deserves to be trashed.

Specifically she says there are parts of the conversation that he entirely doesn’t seem to remember that don’t fit his foregone conclusions.

Parts are false and entirely imagined.

He did not do due diligence despite having 38 years of proper evidence trail.

She protests about the untruths spread after the war.

Bremen, in August 1983

Very honored Mr. Prof. Müller-Hill !

Mid-July sent you to me a “conversation manuscript” and went subsequently on vacation, so that I time had, to occupy myself critically therewith.

When you in November 1980 to Bremen came, could I well assume, that I in a natural scientist and lawyer’s son a conversation partner of utmost correctness before me had. (I self am lawyer’s granddaughter and niece and know these influences in the upbringing very to value.) At that time wanted you a book write and yourself therefor through conversations inform. Of a publication of the conversation as such was at that time no talk. Otherwise would I immediately the taking down of a protocol (with carbon copy) during the conversation demanded, which subsequently by both conversation partners to sign gewesen would be. That you on your return journey or later notes as memory aid for your work prepared, is self-evident and needs no mention. That you however after over 2 1/2 years suddenly on the basis of the notes written down from the head a “conversation manuscript” and even in direct speech prepare, is an impossible procedure! That would at all only with the presence of a shorthand been possible!

It is completely excluded, that a human after 2 1/2 years a multi-hour conversation verbatim reconstruct can. Were you in study a colleague belonged, that occupied itself among other things with the reliability of witness statements and thereby with the criticism of memory (as I in Göttingen with Prof. Narziß Ach—for medical doctors and lawyers then would you never on the idea come, such “conversation manuscripts” to compose. You send it to me in the expectation, that I it with a few corrections in order bring could. That is completely impossible! I will to you openly say, that I am completely horrified. There miss essential parts of the conversation, precisely those, that do not in your concept fit. Much is simply through imagination supplemented (and completely falsely supplemented). Not only expressions are falsely reproduced, also facts and connections are partly at all not understood. It is impossible—also, if one 6 pages correction thereto write would the manuscript so to correct, that it the former conversation to the sense and to the structure even only approximately correspond would. So goes it thus on no case. A natural scientist and professor can such a thing not so easy make!

I raise objection against a printing of this “conversation manuscript” in whole or in parts. Also a correction can thereon nothing change.

You have 1933 not experienced and the end of the war 1945 as child. You are neither anthropologist, nor human geneticist, nor population scientist. I have to you my concerns therefore at that time said. You have to me repeatedly said, that you nothing as the truth sought. To a successful search belong however prior knowledge, which a critical sifting of the material 38 years after the end of the war make possible. You have not experienced, what after the war in untruths was spread. I recommended to you the book by Horst Geyer to read. Much thereof is long since clarified, because the responsible offices have not 38 years slept. But some things are still not clear recognizable, at least for the outsider. Therefore my warning!

Commentary : Here Karin Magnussen tears Muller-Hill a new asshole.

This prick starts off snidely commenting on the living quarters of Magnussen, as if she’s some evil witch or vampire he came to visit and shit.

The smarmy little fucker tries to tie flowers she has up as connected to the Sunday of the Dead – obviously to tie to the dead at Auschwitz, might as well put a fucking Jewish lampshade on the table too while she’s at it huh, which Magnussen just opens up a can of whoop-ass and points out that Christian holiday would have been 3 weeks after the visit, and that she has flowers up year round.

He was just trying to make some weird fucking like I said, smarmy journalist thing like that he’s in the home of a woman tied to death and even has an “altar” to perform rituals and shit.

Then she goes into what he got wrong describing her teaching career.

– 2 –

From your manuscript (with reference to pages 69–74) I want to single out a few examples and thereby explain them so clearly and thoroughly that no misunderstandings can occur.

to page 69: What does my living room furnishings have to do with the matter? Nothing! I did not give you an “interview”, but had declared myself ready for a discussion of factual questions—you let your imagination run wild here. How you can rely on your memory like this, you can see here: “Altar”?? Nonsense! There is no such thing in my room! “Pictures of the parents and flowers. It is a day after Sunday of the Dead.” Your conclusion: flowers, so Sunday of the Dead—is absurd. With me there are namely flowers standing there the whole year round. Perhaps it is different with you. You do not even bother to make a factually flawless determination, although you could have checked the data yourself. It was namely November 3, and every child ought to know that Sunday of the Dead is the last Sunday before Advent (so about 3 weeks later). I will go into detail here because similar false conclusions and thus factual errors are repeatedly found in your manuscript. The style in which you write, and which you attribute to me in the conversations, is not my style.

Since you obviously have no idea of the activity of a high school teacher (specifically a natural scientist), I will go into it a bit more fully here. It is—also without the manuscript—important, that a university teacher knows what his teaching students must later accomplish. You write about the collection of teaching material as if it were a kind of hobby like stamp collecting.

A teacher candidate had at that time in the two practical training years about 8 weekly hours to teach. Foundation for subject teaching: university studies. Every natural scientist must continuously educate himself scientifically during his professional life. At that time the large field of racial and population science and policy was newly included in the curricula. Since at that time probably nobody from the university was prepared for these fields, everyone had to work through the material from scratch. There was already the Baur-Fischer-Lenz, then also the Kühn-Staemmler-Burgdörfer (hereditary teaching, racial care, population policy) and several extensive specialized books. But one also had to work into primary literature that was foreign to one’s subject (Reich Law Gazette, Statistical Yearbook, “Economy and Statistics”), which required a very great deal of time. A high school teacher must know or have “in stock” ten times as much as he teaches, for he does not hold “lectures” or talks, but rather works through the material in classroom discussion, and must therefore respond at any time to the students’ questions, which often go far beyond the lesson material. (Even today I still have about 20 ring binders alone for the individual subfields of upper-level biology, which were continuously updated with research results through reports.)

The new curriculum had to be taught immediately. Criticism of it or of the enacted laws was not possible at all. Teaching staff with a full teaching load (23–25 weekly hours) could see how they managed their preparation for the new fields on the side. The desire of the older teaching staff for the publication of a collection of materials for convenient reference, as was repeatedly presented to me, was understandable and justified. For me it was a burdensome extra workload and—what I could not foresee—a ballast of unproductive work in later years, when I was burdened with work significantly more heavily than at that time. In connection with schoolwork I will also go into a further point (p. 71)—teaching in these fields in a class with several Jewish female students:

There were no difficulties at all in doing so if one granted these a position of a völkisch minority. They could actively participate in this way, even reporting on their institutions

Commentary : One striking thing here is the whole thing we never hear about how Germany was constantly being bombarded.

Would a Karin Magnussen biopic be cool ? Is it cinematic enough? Hmm.

She’s running around during bombardments with her rabbits she’s breeding and studying for science. I think short AI clips of this would be cool to show in Jude, Where’s My Mengele?.

– 3 –

to page 70: Another point. Since during the relocation of the institute everyone had to procure a place to stay and a possibility to work (the institute was supposed to become a military hospital. In the lecture hall stood already for years beds, since it as an emergency military hospital had to be available at any time), I brought personally at night (despite danger of air attacks en route) to Göttingen for the securing of further work 2 rabbits with special hereditary combination, for animal transports (by express freight!) were at that time no longer possible. Otherwise would I indeed not needed to ride personally. (Small animals may as is known be taken along in the compartment when the fellow travelers are not disturbed. Animals that are hungry make noise—hence the feeding en route!).

to page 72 last line: about that was at all not spoken. v. Verschuer worked on Rh factors (determination also among institute members). How far his assistant was involved in these works, know I not.

to page 73: The remark that I knew that Mengele killed twins in order to send the eyes to the KWI, I reject as an infamous imputation with greatest sharpness. The assertion “She is silent” is untrue. I said to you in the conversation at that time crystal clear that to me of eyes of murdered twins nothing was known, and that for my work twin research did not come into question at all. If you had any idea of twin research, then would you know that eye pigmentation in twins was already long before the war so precisely researched that it was even used as an important trait for twin diagnosis (distinction identical-fraternal). At that time you spoke by the way of packages of specimens. Meanwhile there are only a few left. May I conclude from this that you have meanwhile moved away from the American source that you mentioned at that time? Yes, I told you at that time, I held it to be excluded that a scientist kills someone. I want to explain that even further: A medical doctor, a physician, stands under the Hippocratic oath. He is thus obligated to preserve life, even in the worst states of illness in which a patient no longer wants to live! If he on top of that is a geneticist, he sees in his test subjects not only individuals, but also carriers of hereditary factors. By keeping an individual alive, he preserves at the same time the factors for the following generations. If a test subject dies, then with him his hereditary factors are extinguished. That means for the geneticist: The further work on his problems is over. The lost hereditary factors are not replaceable. He is thus doubly obligated and interested to do everything so that his test subjects stay alive. Would a geneticist be so insane or feeble-minded that he with human lives would also still destroy scientific further work? I repeat that I hold it to be impossible that a medical doctor and human geneticist kills a human being.

to page 74 last paragraph. You write: “The SS, the Mengele, those were no humans”—That I reject as untrue. Do you not notice at all that this stands in flat contradiction to what was said above? I do not think of declaring a human on unproven rumors as a non-human. We live in a constitutional state, and the contemporaries speak e.g. also then of a “suspected perpetrator” when a perpetrator was caught in the act—for his guilt is not yet judicially proven. —I would rather be a blockhead than a slanderer. More clearly I need probably not express myself. As for the misdeeds of the SS special formations (not the entire SS, to which also the Waffen-SS as a fighting troop belonged), all decent people are in agreement in their condemnation. Whoever does something like that, acts not “humanly”, but inhumanly. He is an un-human, but unfortunately still a human, belonging to the species Homo sapiens. No chimpanzee would do something like that! I am a zoologist and see in humans a species, but by no means an ideal one.

– 4 –

Did Prof. Fischer say “species” or “society” in the quote mentioned on p. 74? Is the exact wording of the quote verified? He expressed himself very sharply in his outrage over inhuman acts of violence. — You did not experience the outrage of the German population (handwritten insertion: over Katyn) at that time. What Fischer’s statement referred to, I do not know. Do you know how Fischer judged the misdeeds of the SS special formations? Perhaps even more embittered, because it was Germans who soiled the German name? Have you tried to find out anything about Fischer’s attitude towards this?

A quote taken out of context—from a speech, an essay, a book—can be completely changed in its effect. When in a room illuminated by many bright lamps a 1-watt lamp is switched on or off, it is hardly noticeable. But when in a pitch-black room suddenly a 15-watt lamp is switched on, there arises for dark-adapted eyes the impression of a blindingly strong light source, which is vastly overestimated in its strength.

When you surround a purely grey paper strip with a luminous green frame, the human eye reports a red color tone that objectively is not present at all. Whoever knows the laws of complementary colors can produce the most varied physiologically arising color effects with the same strip. Whoever wants to find objective truth must be very critical in the choice of his means of proof.

On p. 72 you write that Gottschaldt had heard of the atrocities of the SS special formations and had told Fischer. (Is the answer from Fischer cited in quotation marks verified?) Thereupon I told you about the book by Hanna Reitsch. She reports incompletely.. “And with that it was settled.” You simply leave out the essential part, namely that thereupon an official denial followed in a large German newspaper and in the Swedish press (to be read in: H. Reitsch “Fliegen mein Leben”). So if someone like Prof. Fischer—had heard of the atrocities, he had to conclude after the denial that his informant had become a victim of enemy propaganda. Has this consequence not become clear to you at all, or why did you leave out precisely this essential communication? I have in some places the impression that you simply forgot things that did not fit into your concept.

I had the good fortune to have enjoyed excellent mathematics instruction in school in the upper classes, through which we were also educated to the critical use of terms so that false conclusions could be avoided. Example: Assertion: A cat has ten tails. Proof: A cat has one tail more than no cat. No cat has nine tails. Also: A cat has ten tails. — That is by no means meant mockingly! — How often are terms used in completely different meanings! That must lead to misunderstandings.

When a chemist is supposed to converse with a human about chemical problems to whom the terms “atom”, “ion”, “molecule” are not clear, hardly essential results are to be expected during the conversation. How will it be during a conversation in another subject area when the terms “human”, “people” and “race” are used in completely different meanings? The definition is there still significantly more difficult and the danger of misunderstandings very much greater. All the more carefully must the use of the terms take place.

In your manuscript many places would still need to be corrected.

– 5 –

On one matter I would like to touch today still. On p. 74 write you: “And then says she ‘What we need is democracy’ and ‘write You that not. It is much too early that to understand… That democracy is a necessary reaction, and that historically seen, to dictatorship, might well already other people determined have. That you that not write should, is after all complete nonsense. I have you warned not to publish your planned book now, because not only much is unproven and unclear, but also much cannot be objectively presented at all, because distance is missing. I estimated 5–10 years (not 15!), that it would take until one could have clarity. In the last 2 1/2 years already some things have become clearer. (Have you read the last book by Albert Speer and accidentally heard the lecture by Hoimar von Ditfurth on TV channel 2?) What you write in that paragraph are not my words. Again and again you put formulations into my mouth that I did not use! With such clear words as you claim in your last sentence, I did not warn you then. After reading your “conversation manuscript” I could rather agree with the formulation coming from you.

Since you sent no duplicate along to me, I have photocopied the manuscript. I would like, however, for reasons of correctness, not to transfer the manuscript with my annotations simply by hand. I must therefore first go to a copy shop before I can send back your manuscript to you. Therefore I send the letter ahead.

In the hope that my explanations may contribute to the clarification of the many ambiguities

Commentary : Hill is on the ropes.

That Mengele however killed Gypsies in order to send their eyes to the KWI Institute to v. Verschuer or to you, is a fact. 

It sure as fuck is NOT a fact that Mengele “killed” gypsies just so Magnussen could examine their eyeballs in a jar, and he has yet to READ the refused publication manuscript Magnussen attempted to have published at the end of 1944 or early 1945, and neither has anyone other than like the 3 Jews who posted bullshit scientific journal hoax papers about it until I leaked it! Which is what Karin is protesting AGAIN AND AGAIN. In fact she states it is IMPOSSIBLE Mengele deliberately killed patients in these studies.

When I conducted the conversation with you, I only knew of the twin eyes mentioned by Nyizli. Today I know of the heterochromatic Gypsy clan, about whose eyes you sent a manuscript end of ’44 or beginning of ’45 to the Journal for Inductive Descent Research.

This dumbass believes the Jewish vindictive fiction writer Miklos Nyiszli. This Jew invented a dark and stormy Frankenstein night where 4 sets of twins were thrown in front of his autopsy table. He notices 3 pair of twins display heterochromia, two different colored eyes, one brown, one blue. Nyiszli lies and claims he sent these eyeballs off to where Magnussen would be receiving them. THESE Heterochromatic TWINS NEVER EXISTED. The Jewish liar Nyiszli made them up. It is a statistical impossibility that even one heterochromatic gypsy twin existed, let alone three pair. They are never mentioned ever in any Magnussen eye study, the Auschwitz-connected study only studied a specific family, the Mechau family of gypsies. These “HETEROCHROMATIC TWINS” are invented by Nyiszli combining two different things he heard from afar Mengele was studying. Much like lying hoaxer Vera Alexander who saw Mengele with hunchbacks and gypsies and twins, she hoaxed and perjured and said Mengele stitched a hunchback twin to the other twin, to make artificially conjoined siamese twins.

There is zero proof Magnussen received ANY TWIN EYES AT ANY TIME, NEVER writes about twin eyes, ever, let alone magical supernatural Jew fairy tale never fucking existed three sets of gypsy twins with heterochromia, and Karin Magnussen’s second study on human eyes with about 20+ eyes (I’ll get to this next) that Jewish Holocaust liars lump in with the real Mechau family eyes WERE NOT FROM AUSCHWITZ.

INSTITUT FÜR GENETIK

der Universität zu Köln

Prof. B. Müller-Hill

Weyertal 121

5000 Köln 41, the 25.8.1983

Telephone 470/ 2388

(Handwritten note top right: received 30.8 / stamp d. 28.8.)

Mrs.

Dr. Karin Magnussen

Hagenauerstr. 7

28 Bremen

Dear Mrs. Magnussen,

I thank you for your letter from 23.8.83. Let me first discuss three main points named by you individually:

1. I have written down the conversation a few hours after the visit, thus still on the train between Bremen and Cologne. I have strived to write down the essentials truthfully.

2. P. 72 the sentence “But you know, that he killed some…” is probably unintentionally ambiguous. Please change “But you know today that he killed some…”. I wanted precisely not to impute to you that you knew that back then. That Mengele however killed Gypsies in order to send their eyes to the KWI Institute to v. Verschuer or to you, is a fact. When I conducted the conversation with you, I only knew of the twin eyes mentioned by Nyizli. Today I know of the heterochromatic Gypsy clan, about whose eyes you sent a manuscript end of ’44 or beginning of ’45 to the Journal for Inductive Descent Research. Prof. Melchers, who had to review the manuscript back then, has testified this to me.

3. Prof. Fischer has written “espece” in his French lecture, which means as much as species. I have a copy of the article.

I write to you again with the request to change, strike or supplement that which you want to change, strike or supplement. Ultimately this conversation becomes significant precisely by the fact that you can represent every sentence that stands there, regardless of whether you have said it back then or not.

In the hope to after all still receive a corrected manuscript from you I remain

with excellent high regard

[Signature: B. Müller-Hill]

Commentary : Here we go Miss Magnussen starts fighting back against this hack.

She tells him he’s come into this with his predetermined conclusions – Mengele deliberately killed the eyeball victims – because a lying Jew, Miklos Nyiszli said so in his Mengele as Dr. Frankenstein book.

She gives a powerful analogy / example that illustrates what this project is all about – Mengele committed ZERO medical crimes. (we hold the “gas chamber” issue as separate and are not commenting on this at this time). Miklos Nyiszli framed Dr. Jose Mengele. The victims died of disease and malnutrition – causes already in existence before Mengele arrived to Auschwitz.

Trash journalists / professor slimeballs / Jewish rabbis posing as historians rushed to judgement / are retarded to believe Jews are a race of truth telling people, or are active members of this insidious cult and I’m cleaning up their bullshit narrative 80 years later.

Karin Magnussen tells him to throw his piece of shit screed in the fucking trash where it belongs.

Way to go Karin!

Bremen, 27.8.1983

Very honored Mr. Prof. Müller-Hill!

Your manuscript with my remarks thereto is photocopied. It was not possible to correct all errors, discrepancies and unclarities. For that one would have needed to add several more pages.

If one considers the manuscript under the viewpoint “search for truth”, then one must come to the assumption that that which you designate as truth is only that which proves your “hypothesis”. You are looking therefore for the confirmation of your “hypothesis”. But what if this now is false? Then lies the truth in the refutation of your “hypothesis”. Have to you never doubts about the correctness of your assumptions come? Perhaps contribute my critical remarks something to insight.

If one does not occupy oneself with the hard against each other working forces of the time back then and on this sector gained clarity, one comes never to insight. The latest book by Albert Speer gives at least about the one side important disclosures.

One cannot solve geological problems with the collecting of pebbles. Without stratigraphy and tectonics it goes not. Pebbles in a drawer are private matter. But if one starts to throw with the pebbles, he changes the situation fundamentally.

A figurative warning (similar things have often happened): In a street a robbery is said to have taken place on a shop. Who is the perpetrator? A Man X has on the days before observed a young man who went back and forth on the opposite street side and in noticeable manner observed the business house. Mr. X is convinced that he has seen the perpetrator and describes him accurately, so that he can be “identified”. (It is established that the young man often picked up his friend who lives in the house in question, and that he at the “time of the crime” was not at all in the street—about which Mr. X naturally knows nothing). The hobby detective is obsessed by his idea to have discovered the robber and would like to place his story rather today than tomorrow in the newspaper.

Then it turns out that at all no robbery took place, but that an employee invented the story (perhaps because he lost the bag with the money that he should bring to the bank on the way… That is here not essential.)

I have given you back then the well-considered advice to wait with the planned publication of your book still 5-10 years. Today would I say: either not at all or after 2-7 years after working through of your manuscript by an expert critic with legal knowledge, after every interviewee from back then has given his “imprimatur” (new version). To give you further information or advice hold I for senseless. Scientists who have recognized their working hypothesis as false use their wastepaper basket for worthless material. Is that in the younger generation different?

Hoping that the criticism was not in vain

(Handwritten note at the bottom: Den Brief möchte ich doch lieber als Drucksache als Einschreiben auf Post geben, damit der Inhalt nicht – zwischen Drucksachen – Unbefugten in die Hände fällt / “The letter would I actually rather give at the post office as printed matter than registered mail, so that the content does not fall – among printed matter – into unauthorized hands.”)

Commentary : Muller sent Magnussen the proposed text for publication.

She says it’s complete dogshit and never to publish it.

This shithead barely kept notes during the conversation, then from memory later constructs full lines of dialogue as if a court reporter was there.

She tells him he’s full of shit, he invented shit, he misconstrues shit, and to shove this shit up his ass. Never to publish it.

Handwritten statement at top:

The manuscript recognize I as reproduction of the conversation from 3.11.1980 not. It can in no case be published, also not after insertion of the corrections and remarks. It corresponds neither in content, nor in form, nor in structure to the conducted conversation. It is only after over 2 ½ years reconstructed and written in direct speech, which without shorthand is absolutely inadmissible – 69-f -. It was not even a protocol during the conversation kept, because at that time was of a publication of the conversation no talk (then would I the keeping of a protocol demanded). – Essential things are left out, others in senseless manner strung together, others through imagination supplemented, others falsely presented. To the conversation partner are assertions and formulations imputed, which do not agree. Many things has the author not at all understood.

I raise objection against a publication.

Dr. K. Magnussen

Bremen, in August 1983

Main body text (with strike-throughs and handwritten additions translated):

(Margin note left top:)

does not belong to the topic !

She lives in an old single-family house. The room is gloomy through the drawn curtains. Art Nouveau. A huge picture ‘A scene from Faust, ~~the church has a large stomach~~’ shows Mephisto, Faust, Gretchen and Mrs. Schwertlein. Beside it portraits and small landscapes in the manner of Corot. A beautiful ~~black~~ sculpture of a mother with her child at her breast. A large relief of a dying youth in the Italian style. I ask about the pictures.

” The Faust picture is from the grandfather, the landscapes and portraits are from the father. He was an academy professor. The sculptures are from the mother. ” Around the table stand wicker chairs. In a niche a ~~bed or~~ sofa. Beside it a tall cabinet with drawers. On it a small altar with pictures of the parents and flowers.

(Margin note left middle:)

Nonsense !

It is a day after Totensonntag [Sunday of the Dead]. She is tall-grown, has parted grey hair and a rather masculine face with clever eyes behind eyeglass lenses. She offers me tea or coffee and cake.

” How have you begun? ” ” Doctorate under Kühn in Göttingen on a topic of developmental mechanics (handwritten insertion above crossed-out text: physiology of the butterfly wing pattern) (she shows an offprint about the resulting work). Then went I into the school. There stayed I from 1933 to 40. (Handwritten insertion: as trainee teacher)

(Margin note left bottom:)

Female pupils

A.

Ah!

(cf. letter)

There have I the laws and regulations on racial hygiene and the statistics collected. The other female teachers have always again said, give us indeed the material. I wanted it as “Material for Teachers” to publish. Lehmann the publisher found the title “Equipment” pulls more people in. I have at that time also scientifically worked. In infants followed, how the eye color from blue to brown converted. In heterozygotes is that slower than in homozygotes. That was completely in connection with my interest for the development of pigments, (handwritten insertion: first in butterflies, from 1941 in rabbits worked)

Top Handwritten Section: (x ↑ Here is missing your criticism of Fischer’s research results and working methods. You assert that the inheritance of mental traits (you use incorrectly the term “properties”) only on 70 – cloned humans could be explored! – Terrible idea: züchtete humans as objects for “exact” research! (Ehrfurcht vor dem Leben? / “Reverence for life?”))

Main Body Text:

dyestuffs. “

” In 1941 (1 typed over with 0) wrote I then to Kühn, whether I with him on eye pigments work could. He referred me to Eugen Fischer. So came I thus as a scholarship holder to Fischer. The assistant positions were all occupied. On paper. The assistants were in the field, the positions were however kept open for them. ” ” Were there employee meetings in the institute? ” ” No. Everyone worked for himself. One could perhaps once ask a colleague. But basically was everyone reliant on himself. ” ” Lectures? ” ” No, none in the institute. In the Harnackhaus there were lectures on various fields. (Handwritten insertion: (Denn im Hörsaal Betten für Notlazarett / “Because in the lecture hall beds for emergency military hospital”)) “

” Fischer was a brilliant man. He proved the operation of Mendel’s laws in humans. You know the ‘Rehobother Bastards’? He led anthropology back into genetics. A scholar of such vision exists today no more. Fischer fared like Hahn. Hahn was innocent of the atomic bomb which the Americans dropped. ” I object that the Hahn observation was correct, the Fischer conjecture on the other hand, (handwritten insertion: a. mental talents, not properties inherit themselves) mental properties are inherited, on the other hand to this day unproven is. (Handwritten insertion: x ↑ She goes over it.) The today’s politicians disregard criminally the findings of the institute. The consequences will all come to feel. But one may not say the truth, or? ” ” One must show that it also is the truth, ” say I and ask about v. Verschuer. ” He was an epigone. It would be better if he had never come to the institute. I would not like to speak about him. Two days before the trucks came which were to relocate the institute to the West, v. V. (inserted) told it to us. But his Bible circle knew it already two days before. We could just give along one or two crates. ~~He has taken all his things with him.~~ I then (inserted: with it) traveled with some of our rabbits to Göttingen in the train. ~~It was forbidden to take animals along.~~ (Handwritten insertion: a) (When the people slept, have I fed them.) After the war worked I then for some time

Left Margin Handwritten Annotations (from top to bottom):

• At this point is in the report statement senseless!

• Nein: Kontroverse! / “No: Controversy!”

• Hoffentlich guter Vorsatz! / “Hopefully good intention!”

• ✓ Prof. Lenz war in seinen wissenschaftlichen u. menschlich-zuverlässigen Arbeiten der geeignete Nachfolger gewesen / “Prof. Lenz was in his scientific and humanly-reliable work the suitable successor”

• ✓ ! (vgl. Brief.) / “(cf. letter.)”

• Mengele!

• Tiertransporte (Hilfskraft) waren damals verboten. Darum musste ich selbst fahren, um die Tiere in Sicherheit zu bringen. / “Animal transports (assistant) were forbidden at the time. Therefore I had to travel myself in order to bring the animals to safety.”

– 71 –

in a research institute. (Handwritten insertion above: Tb-) But I wanted no permanent position. The risk was to me too great. Then became I a female teacher in Berlin. It took a while until my papers were clear. The Americans looked indeed after everything there. But finally it worked out after all. “

” How see you that today, eugenics, the “equipment” etc.? ” ” (Handwritten insertion: /) Die SS has destroyed everything for us that we wanted. We represented the Völkisch idea. ” ” What is that? ” ” That is the (handwritten insertion: state-wise) separation of races (handwritten insertion: to preserve their uniqueness) under mutual respecting of the different peoples. So had we in the Office of Racial Policy thought! You know what that is? Only if one (handwritten insertion: there) member was, (handwritten insertion: after proof of professional education one an employee pass had,) was one allowed to hold lectures on (handwritten insertion above crossed-out text: the whole field of racial and population sciences and policy) ~~racial science~~. That was a very important and good ~~organization~~ (handwritten insertion: institution). Before it existed, have all sorts of people talked the most impossible things. I have before (handwritten insertion above crossed-out text: all) ~~BDM girls~~ (handwritten insertion: seldom before others) spoken ~~and NSV women groups~~. Völkisch separation, that was a good principle. I had in (handwritten insertion: 2) ~~one~~ of my classes ~~a~~ Jewish girls. There was no problem at all. I have said: We do this and you do that. We have not said that the one race is more valuable than the other. Or good and the other bad. That is a value judgment. ~ Scientists ~ (handwritten insertion: For nature) ~ have to abstain from ~ (handwritten insertion: there is in the description of races no) value judgments. What we wanted, that was a Europe of peoples, (handwritten insertion: in which every people could come to its uniqueness, live with its language, culture and religion:) ~~(she smiles).~~ That has the SS all destroyed. Our ~ whole ~ (handwritten insertion: international) eugenics have they with their plans destroyed. We were for the family and they were for their Lebensborn and so on. ” ” Had you conferences or meetings in the Office of Racial Policy where about these things was discussed? ” ” No, ~~that had we not.~~ In 44 was I then supposed to prepare another edition of “Equipment”. There wanted I no more. ~~I said no thank you.~~ There was namely Stalingrad. A leader of his people does not sacrifice an army for the sake ~~of fame~~ (handwritten insertion: of prestige reasons). That is the end of eugenics. A leader should see that his people

Handwritten Annotations in Margins & Bottom:

• Left top margin:

  • Phantasie! / “Imagination!”

  • ✓ Hier fehlt eine Stellungnahme / “Here is missing a statement”

• Left middle margin:

  • Gemeine Antwort ist durch diese Phrase ersetzt (vgl. Brief) / “Mean answer is replaced by this phrase (cf. letter)”

  • Der Autor hat keine Ahnung von Kultur- u. Geisteswissenschaften! / “The author has no clue about cultural and human sciences!”

• Left bottom margin:

  • Stil! A. / “Style! A.”

• Bottom center margin:

  • └ Die Grundbegriffe “Volk”, “Rasse”, “Eugenik” sind dem Verfasser nicht klar. / “The basic concepts ‘people’, ‘race’, ‘eugenics’ are not clear to the author.”

Top Handwritten Section:

(x ↑ Their realization would have made Himmler’s plans fail.)

– 72 –

(Handwritten insertion top left pointing to first line: Es ist die erste Aufgabe der Führung in allen Situationen: Erhaltung des Volkes / “It is the first task of the leadership in all situations: preservation of the people”)

receives maximum care. ” ” You gave indeed the numbers of the fallen in the various campaigns and showed that in the first half year in the SU [Soviet Union] more German soldiers had fallen than in all campaigns combined. “

” That is correct “, says she. ” That with Stalingrad was impossible. (Handwritten insertion: Stalingrad was population-policy-wise irresponsible.)“

” When did you get doubts about ~~the racial policy~~ (handwritten insertion: ?), ” ask I.

(Handwritten margin note right: x ↑ The R.P. [Racial Policy] of Prof. Groß provided in case of general victory in the East an own state for the Jewish people. What Himmler did, knew nobody)

” I knew nothing, nobody in my large circle of friends knew anything. “ ” Fischer? Lenz? Verschuer? (Handwritten insertion: x) ” ” None of those knew anything. No human being knew anything. It was all secret. I do not even know whether the Führer knew of these atrocities of the SS. “ I tell that Gottschaldt knew and told it to Fischer. She smiles incredulously. ” So ~~der~~ Gottschaldt knew that? And what did Fischer say? ” ” If the Führer knew that, say I. ” That is completely correct “, says she. “ If the German people had known that (handwritten correction: gewußt), then this atrocity could not have taken place. Do you know the memory book by Hanna Reitsch “, asks she. ” No “. ” Mrs. Reitsch learned (handwritten correction: in -> aus / “in -> from”) Sweden about it. Then she went to Himmler and asked. ‘ That have I (handwritten insertion: aus / “from”) Sweden heard. Is that true? ‘ ‘ Do you believe that? ‘, Himmler asked back. ‘ Of course not ‘, she said. And with that it was settled. So was that. All secret. ” ” Have you ever listened to enemy radio stations? “, ask I. “ Never, that knew we after all from the First World War, that the others made a atrocity propaganda that was completely untrue. “ ” Do you think that Fischer listened to enemy radio stations? “, ask I. ” Never (handwritten insertion: Sicher nicht / “Certainly not”). He remembered after all also the (handwritten insertion: atrocity reports of) chopped off hands (handwritten insertion: in the 1st World War). We knew nothing. (Handwritten insertion: steht bereits oben / “already stands above”)“

(Handwritten insertion below line: Was sollen solche Wiederholungen? / “What are such repetitions supposed to mean?”)

” But Mengele, Verschuer’s assistant, was after all in Auschwitz. Verschuer must after all have learned something? (handwritten insertion: x) “, say I and ask ” Have you seen Mengele? “

” Yes, ” says she. ” He made a [sympathetic and nice] (handwritten insertion: guten / “good”) impression. ~~He told how he looked after his twins in Auschwitz. About Rh factors~~ (Handwritten insertion bottom: Darüber ist überhaupt nicht gesprochen! / “About that was not spoken at all!”)“

Handwritten Annotations in Margins & Bottom:

• Left Top Margin:

  • A. unmöglich / “A. impossible”

  • welche? / “which?”

• Left Middle Margin:

  • ist meine Antwort woanders? Nonsens! / “is my answer somewhere else? Nonsense!”

  • Nein! Hier ist das Wesentliche einfach weggelassen; darauf erfolgte ein öff. Dementi in der deutschen u. in der schweizerischen Presse! (vgl. Brief!) / “No! Here the essential thing is simply left out; thereupon followed a public denial in the German and in the Swiss press! (cf. letter!)”

• Left Bottom Margin:

  • nicht meine Worte / “not my words”

• Bottom Footnote:

  • *) dürfte sich wohl kaum mit Bibelkränzchen vertragen. / “*) would hardly be compatible with Bible circles.”

Commentary : HERE WE GO !

Karin Magnussen DENIES ever having any involvement with ANY TWIN EYEBALLS WHATSOEVER.

THERE IS ZERO evidence of ANY twin eyeballs being involved in ANY study related to Karin Magnussen’s research.

MIKLOS NYISZLI MADE UP, ENTIRELY FABRICATED THE “THREE PAIR OF GYPSY TWINS WITH HETEROCHRIA EYES” HE LIES AND CLAIMS HE DISCOVERED VIA FINDING A TINY PINPRICK IN THEIR HEARTS ON A DARK AND STORMY NIGHT, REALIZING MENGELE STABBED THEM IN THE HEART WITH CHLOROFORM WHICH DOES NOT FORM CLOTS AS NYISZLI CLAIMED, EITHER.

YOUR MOST IMPORTANT  MENGELE WITNESS IS A DEMONSTRABLE FRAUD, ENTIRELY DEBUNKED BY AVAILABLE EVIDENCE, THE IMPOSSIBILITY OF THERE BEING 6 TWINS WITH HETEROCHROMIA MAGNUSSEN NEVER STUDIED OR REPORTED ABOUT AT ALL AND DENIED EVER BEING INVOLVED WITH OR RECEIVING THEIR EYES.

IT IS A STATISTICAL IMPOSSIBILITY THAT THESE 6 TWINS EVER EXISTED, THE MECHAU FAMILY ALREADY TIPPING THE STATISTICAL ODDS OF THERE BEING 7 HETEROCHROMIA WAARDENBURG SYNDROME INDIVIDUALS IN THE GYPSY CAMP HAVING A 12 TIMES HIGHER PREVALANCE THAN WOULD  NORMALLY BE FOUND.

NYISZLI’S INVENTED, NEVER FUCKING EXISTED “HETEROCHROMIAC GYPSY TWINS” NEVER EXISTED, THEY WOULD HAVE TIPPED THE ODDS OF THERE BEING 13 HETEROCHROMIA WAARDENBURG SYNDROME PATIENTS TO 24 TIMES THE EXPECTED NORMAL OCCURANCE FOUND IN THE POPULATION OF THE GYPSY CAMP OF ROUGHLY 22000 TOTAL WHO EXISTED THE ENTIRE TIME AT AUSCHWITZ.

Anyone who ever cited Miklos Nyiszli is a fucking FRAUD, they should have their degrees REVOKED, they are part of the greatest academic frauds in history.

NO TWINS WITH HETEROCHROMIA EXISTED AT ALL ! LET ALONE 3 PAIR! YOU FUCKING CORRUPT JEWISH FRAUDSTERS !

– 73 –

(Handwritten note top right: how far his assistant was involved in this, I do not know.)

v. Verschuer (inserted) worked, I remember. That is only too natural that he (handwritten insertion: was probably self-evidently) took care of his twins. He was working with twins after all. ” ” But you know that he killed some to send the eyes to the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute? ” say I. ” No, that is completely impossible, that a scientist kills someone (that is completely impossible). “ ” Have you received the eyes, you were working on eyes after all “, ask I. She is silent. ” How did you meet Mengele? Via Verschuer? ” ask I. ” Yes naturally through Verschuer, he knew nobody in the institute. (Verschuer introduced him in the institute.) ” ” It is quite obvious to assume that Verschuer brought you the eyes or had them sent to you. “, say I. ” It is completely impossible that a scientist kills another human being “, says she. ” Nobody knew anything. The murders of the SS are incomprehensible. They have nothing to do with racial theory. We wanted demarcation, but no murders. “, says she. ” But demarcation meant transport through all of Europe (handwritten insertion: 2) to ‘Galicia’ into a ‘ghetto’ (handwritten insertion: 1), (handwritten insertion: no, state,) that comes close to murder when one transports people in cattle cars, ” say I. ” ~~To observe that~~ (handwritten insertion: how should we know anything about that? Thousands of wounded, injured, missing, hospital departments, operations etc. in the offer valid as bombed out), we had no time, says she. (Every night was an alarm. Never could one sleep through the night and then during the day do scientific work. There one had no time anymore for anything else. “

” Where did the error begin? “, ask I. ” With the Nuremberg Laws. Only the Jews were named there. That was outrageous that any Japanese who is even further removed, was allowed to marry a German woman. That was the first error. ” ” But there were hardly a dozen Japanese, for those one did not need a law “, say I. ” Even one molecule, as you know, can have a great effect, ” says she. ” It was also for foreign policy reasons impossible “, say I. ” Yes that was it.

Handwritten Margin Annotations & Additions:

• Top Left Margin:

  This monstrous underline I turn back in the sharpest form.

• Upper-Middle Left Margin:

  Nonsense! I have clearly declared 1) that we knew nothing about eye transports of twins, 2) that for my work twin research was not at all in question (cf. letter)

• Middle Left Margin:

  cf. detailed justification in letter

• Lower-Middle Left Margin:

  Selected passages are humanly low, or purely political

• Bottom Left Margin:

  Nonsense! That I never said!

• Bottom Page Note:

  Völkisch racial policy is defensive. It defends its own people against the intrusion of foreign elements, but of all foreign ones. It is therefore not directed against another people. It does not depend on the number, but on the principle! It has nothing at all to do with hatred, because one respects all other peoples and races in their uniqueness.

– 74 –

outside of our power. Through the Nuremberg Laws everything was directed at the Jews. ” I ask about the conference for the opening of the High School and the discussion of the total solution of the Jewish question. ” No, of that have I never heard “, says she. ” That was no topic of conversation. “ ” Was there anti-Semitism in the institute? ” ” No, ~~that was there not at all~~, ” says she. ” The Frankfurt conference and what was discussed there (I told her before Seraphim’s remarks) that was politics, that was nothing for us. ~~The~~ Rosenberg interested me not. That was ~~after all impossible~~ “. ” That was politics, we made science. ” ” You wanted after all separation “, say I, ” and that means in cattle train from France to Poland e.g. “, say I. ” We had no time, about that ~~to reflect~~, who in the trains was. There was after all the bomb terror, every night. “

Ich tell of the Fischer speech in Paris, where he, after he the atrocities of Jewish Bolsheviks reported, said ‘ the Jews have thereby set themselves outside of the human species ‘. ” There were after all the atrocities of the Bolsheviks. (An acquaintance has told me.) Those were after all also no humans. ” But the atrocity of one can after all not fall back on all “, say I. ” No that can it not “, says she. ” But that has after all Fischer meant. ” Silence. ” The ~~SS~~, the Mengele “, says she, ” those were no humans. Who so something does, who is no human. ” And then says she: ” What we need is democracy ” and ‘ write You ~~that~~ not. It is much too early, that to understand. The time is not yet ripe. The past is much too near. You want the truth, ~~I see that~~, but I ask You, leave You that ~~fifteen~~ years lie. Otherwise is it soon no longer true, what You write. The truth of today, so says it after all, is the error of yesterday. You can yourself also severely harm, if You that now write. “

Handwritten Margin & Inline Annotations:

• Top Left Margin:

  Seraphim is to me no concept. What he said to have, know I no longer (must here be deleted)

• Middle Left Margin (upper):

  what is that supposed to mean here? (probably)

• Middle Left Margin (lower):

  is the wording present?

• Lower Left Margin:

  F. Special research task that is clear! I think not of it, to drag a sick person to a court into publicity! “no concepts + human” cf. letter

• Bottom Left Margin:

  cf. letter

• Inline Text Corrections (top to middle):

  • Above Rosenberg: inserted G.

  • Above crossed out nachzudenken: inserted nonsense.

  • Below nachzudenken: inserted Reflect can one when we about something, what one knows.

  • Above Menschen: inserted Untermenschen

• Inline Text Corrections (lower half):

  • Over das: inserted what

  • Over fünfzehn: replaced with 5–10

  • Over ich sehe das: crossed out

  • Right of schreiben.: inserted write?

• Bottom Page Notes:

  • Why should one probably not write about the historically necessary democracy as contrast to dictatorship?

  • My statements are falsified. The author should leave his book 5–10 years lying, because in the meantime some of his assertions could turn out to be untrue (This might be painful for a scientist and damage his reputation)

  • This manuscript can not be published (cf. sheet = p.69f) Dr. K. Magnussen

INSTITUT FÜR GENETIK der Universität zu Köln Prof. B. Müller-Hill

Weyertal 121 5000 Köln 41, the 31.8.1983 Telephone 470/ 2388

Mrs. Dr. Karin Magnussen Hagenauerstr. 7

28 Bremen

Dear Dr. Magnussen,

I take note with regret that you see yourself unable to correct the “conversation”. I will consequently refrain from a publication and remain

with excellent high regard

[Signature: B. Müller-Hill]

Karin Magnussen got set up by a typical corrupt slimeball Holocaust hoaxer Muller-Hill.

The fucker sat down with her had a conversation, then “remembered” entire lines of dialogue he pulled out of his ass, conveniently leaving out her own protests and defences of his bullshit and Nyiszli-derived lies.

The most important things we can derive from this is –

1. Karin Magnussen never received any eyes from Auschwitz beyond the eyes she marked as “investigated” from the Mechau family in the document they hid for 80 years I had to heist. There is zero proof of any additional eyes of anyone else being sent to her to examine from Auschwitz. PhD Tards who can get us thrown into jail or prison for not agreeing with their LITERALLY NOW PROVEN NYISZLI DERIVED HOAX, added another of Karin Magnussen’s entirely separate study of eyes which appear to have been sourced from a non-Auschwitz source. Likely some Prague university collection or something, we may be able to determine exactly where. Why? Because for one the eyes in that study, which I will get to next, are described as central European. Not Jewish or Gypsy. They would have been described as Jewish or Gypsy because the entire – and I’ll publish this next- published article in a medical journal is entirely about racial differences in eyeball parts. In addition, a few of the eyes in that study of about 30 eyes are described as from PAPAU, WAY THE FUCK OUT OF EUROPE, and no one from PAPAU was sent to Auschwitz. Plus they even studied a Negro eye and NO NEGRO was ever in Auschwitz, ever. NEGRO PLEASE !
2. Magnussen protests that Mengele would have killed anyone for medical research. (I am not getting into gas chamber claims in this project yet, I would need the REST OF THE DOCUMENTS THEY ARE HIDING FROM US to be able to truly analyze truth vs. facts and numbers on top of it). Magnussen protested that especially a hereditary geneticist needed to follow the family futher down the line multiple generations into the future !MENGELE WAS FRAMED BY THE DEMONSTRABLE LIAR AND HOAXER MIKLOS NYISZLI. THERE WERE NEVER EVER NEVER THE FUCK EVER THREE SETS OF GYPSY TWINS WITH HETEROCHROMIA EYES STABBED IN THE HEART BY MENGELE, THE SECRET DISCOVERE BY NYISZLI, WHO ALSO FUCKED UP BY CLAIMING HE SMELLED THE CHLOROFORM AND NOTICED THE MASSIVE CLOT THAT PREVENTED BLOOD FROM LEAKING OUT OF THE VENTRICLE – BECAUSE CHLOROFORM DOES NOT FORM INSTACLOTS LIKE THAT WHATSOEVER. Plus, the fucker Nyiszli invented a second tale of this anyway, where he personally witnessed Mengele stab the hearts and Nyiszli put the non-existent victims on the table.

BYE BYE NYISZLI. BYE BYE PhD hacks who fucking used that bastard as a source.

MAGNUSSEN NEVER EXAMINED EVEN ONE SET OF TWIN EYEBALLS. There were ZERO twins with heterochromia in the Mechau family with this hereditary genetic syndrome now known as Waardenburg today. NYISZLI LIED. Anyone who ever quoted him as a source might as well have quoted the stalag novel atrocity porn fiction “House of Dolls” or Elie Wiesel’s fictional psychadelic talmudic atrocity porno “Night”.

GOOD NIGHT NYISZLI ! Strip anyone who cited Nyiszli of their PhD’s right now.

On the larger Jewish / Marxist led attack on politically incorrect anthropology, skull measuring, brain measuring, genetic racial inequality, and Noticing.

It’s too bad the great James Watson got roped into writing the forward to an edition of this piece of shit book.

The fact is James Watson did not hold views far from the “Nazi” establishment which is race realism and for the most part just practiced accepted science at the time before Jews forced us not to tell the truth and ignore what all of human history and evidence shows.

Watson had to sell off his Nobel prize medal after he was cancelled for saying Africa is Africa because of genetics, and the accomplishments of Europe and Europeans are because of genetics, and this is hardcoded into DNA and cannot be changed via education.

The back cover of this book is ridiculous, and obviously so is the entire thesis. Jews forced anthropology to be racial Marxism. Every race somehow evolved the same according to mandated belief of academia. Not only that, sheeeit – “race” doesn’t even exist, whitey! You MUST believe the Germans who created Werner von Braun are the equals to the smol brained savages of the North Sentinel Islands or Jews will end your career like they did the great James Watson.

The back cover of this book is ridiculous because it states that Germans basically didn’t need hard genetic code proof that science later proved correct, the genetics of alcoholism, things like this. That they already knew this and dared to enact eugenic policies rather than today’s dysgenic policies forced upon us by Jews flooding our countries with invaders from um “developing” races on dingies. And somehow the Germans are evil because they knew this before genetic code was hacked, because there were other ways to determine the inequality of the races, such as the fact that certain people like the savages of the North Sentinel island and cannibal tribes still exist, run around without a written language and huts made of feces, still have yet to discover the wheel while London, Tokyo, and the greatest video game of all time, Jet Set Radio Future exists.

German anthropology, and the rest of the Western world for that matter at the time – just correctly recognized it via other ways-  measured skulls and brains and historical accomplishments and architecture and inventions and came to determine f0r instance, the tribes of head shrinking savage cannibals of the world are not equal to Europeans, and evolution didn’t work the way Jew Karl Marx and his cohorts wish it did. REE ! about it Hill, you nut.

In the world of the future we shall declare those who present the false religion of the fake Jew Marxist anthropology the Jews forced upon us as to genocide European mankind as insane. They can feel free to plead not guilty by reason of insanity when we throw them on show trials, like they did me.

Yes there were murders, apparently even gassings of those the Germans wanted out of their society, like at Hadamar where these documents were stashed.

There were murders of Germans themselves because of the belief in eugenics improving larger German society and apparently carbon monoxide gassings of severe schizophrenics, epileptics spazzing out all day, tards, and such. Today Nordic Europeans test for Down’s Syndrome and abort the pregnancy before bringing into society a severe drain which costs multiple normal humans to waste their life to support. Make your society, retarded, goy, or you’re a nazi.

The extent of the murders of Jews and to a lesser extent gypsies are in dispute. Nyiszli invented murder victims after all.

I’m the first member of the intelligentsia the Jews and their Pilates were able to imprison and force sterilize. We have to stop them YESTERDAY. Jews act like Nazis when they have power. Jews are genociding European mankind now using similar techniques to the Ughyur genocide -mandating policies that lower births, flooding our countries with foreigners they would never dare let flood into Israel, constant anti-white and yes – race-mixing propaganda while Jews keep their own race inbred, while telling us we deserve to be blended out of existence for being white, and therefore Nazi. We must not allow Jews to physically do to us what they are doing to the Palestinians.

Send all gypsies to Israel. After all we all be equals n shit. 

There were murders and cruel slow starvation deaths of gypsies and Jews. Because of this, those like Hill pushed upon European mankind the fake Jewish science of race denial, racial Marxism, where race isn’t real and it’s good to flood your country with millions of non-Europeans who are clearly not our equals as their own fleeing from their failed backwards racial homelands proves. Jews themselves don’t believe this, and do not follow these “suicidal empathy” policies as the Jew Gad Saad so beloved by Musk falsely puts forward. Europeans aren’t suicidal, we are being genocided, by Jews, and their main battering ram is the presentation of ideas Jews themselves know not to be real and enact policies themselves not far from the Nazis, knowing racial science to be real, and important to enact political policy to protect their own inbred tribe.

The inhabitants of the North Sentinel Islands are savages, cannibal tribes come from DNA lines far less evolved than my beautiful blue eyed white boy ass. REE ! ABOUT IT.

Send them to Israel. We all be equal. Or ur evil for noticing.

Because of the excesses of the SS, Jews and the Soviets (Same thing, see Karin Magnussen referencing Jewish Bolsheviks, common knowledge) forced upon their European enemies, WHITEY, the genocidal concept of racial Marxism, that eugenics is bad, dysgenics is good – and Christian too, goy.

Almost all of what was known as racial science is real, just declared verboten by ZOG and their slaves. Jews know this perfectly well, but are using this strategy on the gullible goy to blend us out of existence, we are already at the stage where we are being physically murdered, raped, and conquered by falling for this Jewish trick. In order to resist our genocide, we must embrace politically / semitically incorrect anthropology and eugenics which was once just known as common sense throughout the Western world.

One of these things is not like the other. Notice these things and don’t worship blank slate impossible, scientifically disproven racial Marxism, and Jews will James Watson, let alone Eric Hunt you.